Find a Lawyer

RIAZ BOTTLERS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE-I, LAHORE

Section 62 and 136 (2) Question of the notice of the Assisi on Law under section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, Assessment Officer, claiming exemption of market exemption and discount distributors, margin, lll Phil allowance, wages Have a full discussion on the issue of payment. Temporary workers paid through cash, salaries, wages, sales and advertising, unit distribution, deep freezer purchases, etc., were assessed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's quality indicators under Section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance. An appropriate notice was present. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had examined the question that the questions suggested by the assessee were not the most notable. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal confirmed the treatment after considering the facts of the case. The Assisi did not make a good impression on the taxpayers' credibility and the credibility of the account, the fact finding was not satisfactorily contradicted in the subordinate stages, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal under section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 The decision of the notice did not raise any question of law and in particular it was. Respect for the increase was used when the back was present, but errors were a matter of correction and did not give rise to the question of law. Asami's proposed questions were not created by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal order, so the exclusionary question was cited. As stated in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal answered in the affirmative, the reference was disposed of accordingly \ r \ n \ r \ n pakistani advocates Wahi hassain lawyer