Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus STATE

Sections 302 (b), 324 and 337f (i), (ii), (iii) from the value of the evidence prove that the enmity between the parties was clear; the fact is that fifteen people with deadly weapons were killed. Were shown on the spot, during the course of the trial, the complainant made an unprecedented improvement in his statement, which was completely contrary to the statement in the FIR, the statements of both the prosecution witnesses under section 161, CC PK casts a heavy shadow on his truth and it would be strong speculation that his statements were recorded after consideration and the complainant's statement was not recorded at the police station, but the other The place was recorded. The complainant admitted that the accused had never been arrested. Until his statement was recorded in court, no evidence was available on the police record that the accused was accused of arresting the accused, but none of the investigating officers of various degrees could have been neglected. Medical evidence has ruled out the extent of the prosecution's case. Up until now, the prosecution and the prosecution witnesses had received fireworks wounds, but no further weapons were recovered and could not be used against them. None of the defendants were recovered on the spot, neither sealed nor numbered in the parcel, nor did they support the statement of the prosecution witness on the request of Franzic Science Laboratory Defense. The statements of the prosecution witnesses, which were extremely insecure against the accused, were neither affecting confidence nor argued from any credible evidence, the prosecution case was without any doubt. list of advocates from Farooqabad lawyer