The testimony of Section 302 (b) of the evidence, the reduction of eye witnesses, supported the prosecution's case and they were credible because there was no background of hostility between the parties as the case was only of one accused and the real brother of the accused. An alternative cannot be expected from. The medical evidence for the real culprit did not appear to contradict the ocular evidence. The pistol was recovered from the instance of the accused, which proved beyond any doubt in the prosecution case that was vacant, the defendant's sentence was upheld. When the age given by the accused at the time of his arrest was changed to 1 / // years of age, he was changed to 18 him / years years in order to keep him out of any benefits. The accused was dismissed from the job. One shot and the other shot no fire
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
