MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE THROUGH MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus STATE
Definitions of evidence 2302 (b) / & 34 & 2 392/3434 were not mentioned in the names of witnesses, despite the FIR being delayed by eleven hours in that the testimony of the four witnesses was unnatural. They had witnessed the murder of the victim. However, they did not bother to report the matter to the police or to the victim's relatives and the explanation offered by them in this regard was not credible, witnesses also presented their testimony in the witness box. Statements have improved significantly. A witness from the concerned hotel failed to prove the alleged conspiracy by the accused in the murder of the victim, who did not prove the motive and the motive behind the incident. Unreliable ocular testimony cannot be verified No crime is vacated after an opportunity is vacated, recovery of pistol from the accused was not helpful. The prosecution suspect was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Chaghi lawyer