Find a Lawyer

FAYYAZ AHMED versus STATE

Sections 7, 9 and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, Section 7 of the Public Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, to decide on the jurisdiction of the relevant section of the crime or its application. Prosecutor Anti-Terrorism Court Constitutional Request The police were summoned to the FIR on the basis of allegations of harassment in the public petitioner in 1997 / A defendant stated that a constitutional petition was appealed to the High Court, during the same petition, section 173 c.c. The report was sent under PC. The Public Prosecutor Anti Terrorism Court, which did not attract the provisions of Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 even after the facts of the case were stopped, challenged the Station House Officer to discharge the offense under Section 7 of the Act. Instructed to present. It was stated that the order was challenged by the complainant in section 9 of the Constitutional application of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, did not give the public prosecutor the authority to abolish the offense under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 Gone, the Public Prosecutor Anti Terrorism Court did not have jurisdiction over the trial court's jurisdiction, jurisdiction, and jurisdiction to decide the question of jurisdiction or its application. The relevant Public Prosecutor, the Anti-Terrorism Court, has passed beyond his jurisdiction and authority, traveled beyond his jurisdiction and authority and committed serious illegal action, with no jurisdiction and no legal authority whatsoever. Was placed, deprecated immigration advocates email from Machh lawyer