Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI SHAH versus STATE

In view of the value of the testimony of section 302 (b), the witnesses were concerned with the accused as well as the accused and did not have any personal background of hostility or ill-will towards the accused as they implied that he was wrongly implicated in the case. Do Once established, the availability of eye-witnesses at the relevant time was substantiated by minor errors made by the Investigation Officer or by the draftsman, which were insufficient to lighten the credibility of eyewitnesses. , The incident occurred during an FIR on a broad day. The complainant filed the complaint promptly, the accused was specially designated in the FIR because the sole culprit of the crime of murder on the occasion was dependable and had full credibility, which was called medical evidence. Had the full support of. And with the FIR immediately listed, the pieces of evidence were sufficient to prove the defendant's homecoming was merely a failure to establish the prosecution's failure, but it was not enough to decide whether to execute a murderer's death. Be limited to life imprisonment. The accused cannot be allowed to take advantage of his silence. On the basis of any justification for launching aggression against the deceased or claiming an unprofitable premium, and the mystery itself arose that Base had to hold the accused himself for sympathetic treatment in the case of punishment and if She must have been quiet. In this regard, the law had to become normal again, the accused murdered an innocent person throughout his life with cold blood and sentenced him to death without justifying such abominable act. Of famous supreme court advocate from Peshawar lawyer