Find a Lawyer

SHAFQAT ALI versus NIGHAT PERVEEN

The defendants of the constitutional plea suit for the recovery of articles in section 5 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, objected to the premise that any collection of dowry articles was obtained through the presentation of any witnesses. Was not proven. The statement in relation to the dowry articles was recorded in the course of the trial which she had, during the cross examination, the lady omitted the minor details of all the articles in the dowry that were part of her death. Did not mention. The plaintiff's case will not be affected because he clearly mentioned in the paragraph of the plaintiff the nature of the articles in the dowry, but the value of it as a whole, even in such cases, is definite and definite. No need for rigorous technical compliance Defining the trial court in relation to the evidence brought on record was not of such a nature as to be internationally demanded due to non-enforceable family court action. According to the unusual jurisdiction provisions of the High Court, the family court will go through their rigor and technical capabilities. Had to be assessed because a careful person would review it. And come to a conclusion the trial court-approved decision, no intervention needed pakistani advocates Bolan lawyer