MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus STATE
Despite being designated in Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 371A & 371B Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 38 bail, FIR, the accused's grant is still involved in his prostitution. Not available on record for proof. The business was based on the confessional statements of the accused given to the full FIR police officer, who were not admissible in evidence in view of Article 38 of the Conan martyrdom. In 1984, the accused was arrested for having no sexual activity. , Nor was any money recovered from it. There was no independent evidence linking the accused to the police's alleged crime, which was undoubtedly not proven, as they deliberately arrested all the accused outside the premises and recovered the amount of illegal business transactions. That was always done. A further investigation into his crime was needed in the homeowner's case and he was admitted on bail in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Panjan Kisan lawyer
