Find a Lawyer

ABBAS versus STATE

Section 302 Declaration of Death Testimonial Intention Delayed death is not a direct result of the wound After suffering wounds, the deceased went to the hospital for treatment and died about 49 days after the incident, pronouncing the death of the deceased. On the basis, the trial court sentenced the accused and sentenced him. Valid incidents for his death occurred in the fields at 9.30 am on 15 May 1993 and the statement of the deceased was taken to the hospital at 8.30 pm on 29 August 1993 when the deceased was taken to the hospital. So he was conscious and did not designate any culprit. The Investigation Officer visited the hospital where the deceased was admitted for treatment but after receiving feedback from the doctor about his condition, his statement was recorded. No explanation is available as to why the deceased's statement was not recorded on 25 9 1993? 29 199 Until 1993, the deceased's relatives remained with the Investigating Officer while D's statement continued to be recorded. The Police Rolls Investigation Officer took no action to bring the magistrate to record the deceased's statement. Nor did he witness to the doctor's investigating officer that the injured relatives were thrown out of the room. Recording the statement of the deceased that the deceased was a tutor during the treatment of the injured person and he made a statement with counseling / consideration, cannot be denied because he died on 18 11 1993 his During this he underwent surgical intervention and causation. The death of the doctor as soon as he was seen by the doctor was septicemia and he was hospitalized. The victim's death was due to him how to become a advocate from Nankana Sahib lawyer