Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 302 (b) evidence was appreciated in the darkness of the night and was the only source of light, according to prosecutor's testimony, which was led by the prosecutor's witness / defendant's brother, which was changed only upon hearing. ? The accused's guilt, otherwise the prosecution's two witnesses were on their way without being put on the torch, leaving the real father and real brother late when he was critically injured and taking steps to save the lives of the prosecution witnesses. Had run to his house instead. Do not report the matter to the police for more than eight hours; the unidentified delay in filing the FIR was unknown, indicating that the prosecution witnesses were not present at the time of the incident, no one in the FIR No discriminatory characteristics of the accused were also described. , The prosecution had failed to prove that it had allegedly had a karate knife, at which point the witness of the prosecution's confession admitted that the name of the alleged knife had no name or any other identity. No mark was available and he stated that the knife was normal and there was no blood stain on the market and no fingerprints were taken to match the match. The alleged extra-judicial confession made jointly by the accused, with finger prints of the crime, was unacceptable. No compelling evidence was available against the accused for the confessional offense 8/9 months after the incident. Only the cause of death was stated and did not lead to the attacker The blood stained theft was recovered after almost a month in the case of the accused immigration advocate from Shakargarh lawyer