MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus SURRAYA BEGUM
Arts 199 and 185 ()) By the order of the Mohammedan La Gift Commissioner, the gift of the respondents was amended and amended, and the Board of Revenue Petitioners affirmed that the constitutional jurisdiction of the Board of Revenue Attempt to challenge the order failed. The constitutional petition filed by the applicants was misconstrued as to whether the gift was valid or not, it was a question which could only be decided by the Civil Court applicants, so their alternative solution was available. Applicants were not suitable for a High Court holiday constitutional jurisdiction. The appeal was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Rangoo lawyer
