HAMID NAWAZ versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER OF POLICE STATION MITHA TIWANA, DISTRICT KHUSHAB
Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 379, 440 and 337H (ii) / 34 Constitution Petition The termination of the FIR applicant / accused and his co-accused was specifically designated in the FIR Accusations were leveled against them. Their value was justified, then the initiative revealed some of the most notable crimes the local police had, but the FIR allegations leveled against those involved in the FIR and its accomplices. Was completely deemed a reality. The nature and allegations of such allegations must also be denied that the current summary proceedings under Article 199 of the Constitution require the conduct of an inquiry by the High Court. It is the legal responsibility of the police to investigate the crime. And the High Court will not take steps to prevent the above-mentioned police duty in such a premature phase. The High Court has refused to intervene.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
