Find a Lawyer

SYED SHAHEEN HAIDER versus MST. SYEDA KANEEZ KUBRA

Applicants who had registered Section 22A & 22B constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition, had questioned the proceedings before the Court of Justice under Sections 22A and 22BCPC against which it A lawsuit against the mother / defendant was started to register. The petitioner's case was that the parties closed the civil litigation regarding the two documents. As Talukanma and Talmakunma, which were executed in the interest of the parties, the petitioner submitted that there was a reasonable fear in his mind that the Justice of Peace would pass any order in the usual direction. The relevant HA to file a case, if the petition is moved by the defendant, it will show the commission of an unrecognizable offense. The applicant further added that Justice of Peace has mechanically approached the section HA police station. A report has been summoned mentioning the presence of the clerk. This advice, which is on its face, was not guaranteed by law and gave the impression that the lawyer's clerk argued the case. The lawyer's clerk was neither authorized nor entitled to appear in the court proceedings, nor was the Justice of the Peace required to attend and entertain the solicitor's clerk under Section 22A & 22BCPC and to file and apply it. Was not allowed to issue the required Related Impact The High Court demanded the process of seeking and responding to the section H report, that the Justice of Peace would pass the final order and hear the petitioner and the documents filed by him in support of the matter. Will also review. Already b immigration advocates from Makli lawyer