Find a Lawyer

RANA TAJ MUHAMMAD versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD

Section 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Excerpt from the High Court jurisdiction over the High Court jurisdiction to conclude jurisdiction Final findings of facts / Evidence of documents filed by former rulers A decision was made in their favor at the same time. The court and the lower appellate court raised by vendor that the material pieces of evidence were ignored by both courts. It was not sacrilegious to determine the harmony of the courts below and if any material, illegal, irregular, non-readability, the High Court may dismiss it. The misrepresentation of the evidence showed that Scope Wendy proved that he too was a co-owner of the estate, so the property-based professional kings had the preferential right of ownership and the right of shopkeeper to the estate. The owner was wrong. Instead of misreading / misreading such pieces of evidence, there was ample scope for setting up the acid. The decisions and orders of both the courts, under the High Court, were amended. That is, set aside all the conclusions and orders passed by both the courts. \ r \ n ask a advocate free from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer