Find a Lawyer

MST. SAIRA ZULFIQAR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN

Section 5 Muslim Family Law Ordinance (VIII of 1961), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for recovery of Dover amount, Recovery of married wife of married couple is demanded as Rs 20,000,000 as Family Court. Declared judgment in favor of his wife up to Rs. The appeal filed by the lower appellate court and the wife was dropped. The real estate and 1/2 share was in addition to the amount of money that was included in the marriage contract and its contents became an integral part of the marriage contract, and the contents / entries in the marriage agreement were as follows. Should be read in conjunction with the agreement, when such interpretation was specifically ignored by the contents of the contract and the agreement, both courts were free to enter into the terms of their choice. 20,00,000 was free in itself and property and gold jewelry were less than the results of the rights of both the courts, besides the evidence on the record in exchange for the amount of gold jewelry and property rights. Were completely false. Both the courts mistakenly and illegally took the position that the spouse and the executor were not entitled to the property mentioned in the High Court. Under the constitutional jurisdiction, the two courts separated the results in their decisions to the extent of the property mentioned. The court approved the decisions of both the courts and online advocate from Rangoo lawyer