Find a Lawyer

MST. MEHNAZ versus JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE 1ST CLASS/CIVIL JUDGE, ATTOCK

Sections 616161, 3 363 and 4 364 of a Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Article 561 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for the abduction of a real son by dishonestly investigating, imprisoning the accused. The magistrate arrested on the complaint of the wife denied the accused's physical remand for abducting his minor son and declared him guilty of the offense, the legality of the provisions of Sections 361, 363 and 364A, P.O. The PC was to protect the rights of parents in the custody of the minor under the Islamic law. Even when the minor child was in the custody of the mother and so the mother's guardianship was not extinguished, while the minor child was with the father, the father was also the legal guardian of his minor children and the legal guardian was the legal guardian of his minor children. Was in the making if a father removed his child from the custody of his wife, the father could not be punished or punished for kidnapping. He is not liable to stand trial for abducting his minor son. Is alleged to be the natural and legal guardian of the abducted High Court, as well as its constitutional jurisdiction While exercising and inheriting powers it was not considered that he would leave the victim and the victim at the mercy of the police. The investigating agency was accused of wrongdoing / humiliation of his / her without any fault. Was abducted, the High Court imposed a fine of Rs 25,000 on the investigating officer for his dishonest inquiry, using powers under Section 561A, CRPC, to resolve the accused's complaint. ? Corrupt Practice Petition advocate from Landi Kotal lawyer