Sections 302 (b), 148 and 149 of the murder, rioting, general evidence praising the event were a nightly event and there was no light source The incident was surrounded by banana crops and houses, but police did not record the record. Were there any recent conflicts between the parties to the statement, strong coordination was needed to filter out the evidence of interested and non-witnesses, as witnesses did not give real time to file an FIR After the complainant filed an FIR, the police did not record a statement from these persons on the advice of 3/4 policemen. Those who were at the hotel where the incident took place, the most important prosecutor did not examine the hotelier, whose statement was recorded by police. The prosecution's witness, who was also the alleged eyewitness to the incident, was released at the behest of the complainant. All showed that the trial was not conducted, was conducted in a transparent manner, and important evidence was suppressed. That the prosecution did not prove the motive of the incident either verbally or through documents, no criminal weapon was recovered from any of the accused, only the allegedly recovered from the scene of the incident, could not prove that they were fired. Was done. Police recovered seven empress recovered from Vardhat's place, but no ballistic report was produced by the prosecution, no criminal weapon was recovered from any of the accused, it was not possible to match the vacancy and report. Be positive The record of supporting the testimony of two of the prosecution witnesses, the defendant who was shown as a mastermind, was granted by the trial court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
