Find a Lawyer

MURSALEEN versus MST. BASHIRI

The trial court upheld the trial court's ruling on the basis of section 122 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), section 353 on the basis of fraud, fraud and misrepresentation on the basis of Islamic law gifts, fraud and misrepresentation, but appealed. The Court rejected the contention that there was no evidence on record that a legitimate gift was given in favor of the defendant and that it was a gift given to him. Authenticity of the gift, the defendant is obliged to prove the reality of the gift in positive terms, such as the day, date, month, time and place where the donor consciously made the decision to give the gift, its property and offer, Which was accepted by the DD / Defendant, the defendant also failed to prove that the grant of possession of the suit property in the case of Oral Ji. If, by a Muslim, the confiscation of the possession for the verification of a custody transaction was non-scientific, the present case did not prove that the appellate court in any way misused the law or misrepresented or recorded the evidence. In the absence of reading the passage through it cannot be interrupted law firms from Harnai lawyer