Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER

Article 84, 85 85 and Constitution 89 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Movement of Memorandum of the Constitution Petition Against the Union Council Moderator, Holding Repeal Processing at the Time and Place of the Applicant Moderator Approved in the previous Constitution Petition The applicant's request was directed that they do not report the action again. That they were seriously condemned. Such order of the High Court was in the knowledge of both parties, the absence of the petitioner in the proceedings of the memorandum meant compliance with the order of the Returning Officer of the High Court, but once the petitioner's illness was postponed the proceedings. Was made, but on the basis of which the request for postponement was denied a second time, the Returning Officer refused to postpone the proceedings due to the hearing of the intra-court appeal in the absence of any injunction. And it had no right to continue against the will of the voting because the right to a hearing was present with the attendant and could not be an excuse to retain any illegal proceedings and frustrate the voters' wishes. The House Petitioner was offered a fair opportunity and could not frustrate the memorandum of exploitation gs nothing is on record to prove Malala's ruin. immigration advocate from Mangowal lawyer