Find a Lawyer

STATE versus MUHAMMAD ARSHAD

There was no background of hostility between the parties in defining the evidence found in the Appellant's Evidence Against Section 2 302 (b) / & 34 & 4 Pro4 / 3434 Criminal Code (v. 1898), section 464, when the case of the accused was present. I had recovered a pistol. In this case, the Light Star witness of the day was an injured witness who was accused of placing a fatal shot on the victim's chest during the incident. The eyewitnesses were natural witnesses of the incident, whose medical evidence and recovery evidence were prosecuted and, beyond any doubt, proved their case against the accused. However, the incident took place sixteen years ago and twelve years had passed when an unpleasant verdict of acquittal was announced and the state preferred the present appeal in the same year before the High Court accused There was only one shot of an earlier case. The allegation of kite-making and exchange of unruly remarks was not based on the evidence of the prosecution and the principles of safe administration of criminal justice resulting in the death of the accused in section 302 (b) / 34, PPC. Was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment. The accused was also convicted under Sec. 324/34, PPC, and sentenced to 7 years' RI for the injury of a prosecutor's witness. list of advocates from Kamalia lawyer