Find a Lawyer

SHAHBAZ NOOR versus STATE

Sections 324, 506, 148 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 and 7 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution dismissing an FIR or removing section 324, PPC and section 7 Was asked to delete alternatives to On the basis of the clear reading of the FIR, the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, no trial was made under the said provisions and it was stated that the provisions were merely to enhance the offense and to make such non-bailable case. Has been added to It is being shown that a remote golf course was being constructed just off the residential area and on the main road, in addition, if the alleged assault was launched according to the FIR, some damage should be done to the FIR. Was. It was mentioned that the applicants / accused and their accomplices, who were carrying dangerous firearms, had resorted to firing, but surprisingly, no physical damage was done, whatever The shooting happened. Attract the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, no statement was recorded of any of these foreign or Pakistani workers who were allegedly intimidated to support the claim of prosecution of section 324. , PPC has not even revealed anything to him. The simple reason is that no damage was done, though the applicants were allegedly equipped with heavy weapons, neither Section 7 nor Section 324 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, facts of the case. And applied to the situation. lawer from fb area from Landi Kotal lawyer