ALI GOHAR versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SIND
Article 212 (3) Martial Law Regulation, 1972 (CMLA) s No. 114 Marshal Law Order, 1978 (CMLA) No. 23 Office of the Establishment Division Memorandum No. 3/3/78 / R II Dated 5 7 1978 Compulsory Retirement Retirement Sanitary After the wrong retirement, the appointment of officers was retired under the MLR No. 114 of 1972 determining seniority appellant but he was re-employed under MLO 23 of 1978 and Before the appellant was retired, a large number of officers who were junior to him advanced to the next grade appellant who claimed sanity. Prior to his retirement he was a junior but now he is appointed as a senior in the next grade, there will be no progress on the basis of the following principles. But that such officers would be entitled to hold the same position in the same grade in which they would not have enjoyed retirement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
