Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus STATE


Section 295C Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 196 was not filed by an authorized person of the Central or Provincial Government, and the case is reviewed by the trial section 196, CR PC. Was not eligible for Thus, the trial by the sessions court was without legal authority. Otherwise, the evidence headed by the prosecution did not affect trust. The prosecution's case was based on the evidence of a single interested witness whose The statement was not substantiated by any quarter, so is evidence of the testimony of the other prosecution. The police were not reliable, investigating in a hurry without going into the gravity of the crime, the accused was acquitted in cases \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.