Find a Lawyer

ZAHID YOUSAF versus STATE

Sections 497 (2), 91, 204 and Schedule CL (2) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 452, 337f (i), 148 and 149 Guarantees, Guaranteed to ask for bail in the challan case I have already given them bail, they should also be extended on bail in the challan case as Section 9191, CRPC Validity Section, 91, CRPC was generally and it was applicable to the person who Is applicable. Section appearance was required, CRPC not only applied to the accused persons, but it also applied to the witnesses, Section 204, CRPC with the accused and the necessary components to call the accused. Direct Deal, if it is required to take action against the accused then get his attendance, the court should have issued a summons or warrant keeping in view of the nature of each case, pursuant to column 4 of Schedule 2, CC According to Peel Bail, the challan could not have allowed the accused in the case simply because he was admitted on bail in a private complaint related to the same incident, because Section 497, CCP challan shall apply to the decision of the bail application on the merits available to the accused, in the present case neither Section 91, CRPC nor Section 204, CRPC were applicable. As was the accused. The investigation was conducted by the police on the basis of an FIR registered against them and they were present in the case. The accused was not entitled to bail as a matter of right under Section 91 91, CCPC, as per section 204. No action was taken, CRPC was issued against them in challan. In the case, the accused is allowed only on technical grounds without discussing the facts and merits of the bail. top civil advocates from Mamu kunjan lawyer