MUHAMMAD RAMZAN ALIAS DHURLA versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) definition of evidence depends on the testimony of a witness in the case prosecutor who found a skeleton and in whose presence the defendant confessed to his guilt, to associate the accused with the incident. And there was no evidence that the recovery of an empty, pistol from the suspect in the absence of any recovery did not result. There was nothing on record to show that the deceased had suffered any injuries with sharp weapons, the recovery of the hatchet, even in the circumstances, was evidence of extra-judicial confession, usually a weak type of evidence. But there were allegations made in such cases that were not witnessed. Extra judicial confession of the accused's joint, could not be considered legal evidence but the prosecution failed miserably to accuse the accused, the trial court decided. Could not be sustained. The sentence handed down to the accused by the trial court was set aside and they were acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Chak Jamal lawyer
