Find a Lawyer

ABDUL JABBAR KHAN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Testimony of Evidence The Benefit of Doubt Both the complainant and the deceased witness, the deceased's brother, were living far away from the scene of the incident and there was intense enmity between the accused and the complainant witnesses, not just the circumstances But they were also really non-witnesses and on the very foundation that the prosecution witnesses and the accused were present on the ground, the FIR had not fallen on the ground nor the nature of the weapons used, nor was it mentioned. The specific fire was not attributed to the accused in the number of fires, nor was the seat of the injured mentioned. The record fully established that the prosecutor's witnesses were not present at the time of the incident, the prosecution alleged that the defendant's complaint could not be used because it could be reduced both ways. It can also be a major cause of events. The suspect in the case was a licensed weapon with a double-barreled gun allegedly found on the suspect's mark. In the pre-suspect's home, it was not unnatural nor was the rifle nor the gun sent to the forensic science laboratory. There was no recovered from the incident, no one was associated with the public during the rehabilitation process. Under the circumstances, the recovery of arms, it could not be of any use and prosecution against the accused could not be used. ? The prosecution had failed to link the allegedly used motorcycle in the presence of the accused, even though the suspicion originally caused by the incident would be sufficient to dispel the suspicion. patent advocate from Talamba lawyer