Find a Lawyer

AURANGZEB KHAN versus DABAGH (PVT.) LTD.

Section 152 Arbitration Act (IX of 1940), Section 32 Summary Procedure Partial Dispute Shareholders' Registration Specific Arbitration Impact of Contract Improvement The petitioner held that the terms of the agreement were not considered, while the defendants Ali has claimed that all the attention has been paid. The recipient of the compensation was also saddened by the termination of his name from the shareholder's register, the dispute arising under the agreement set forth by the arbitrator in the settlement of the agreement and the non-performance of the agreed terms. There was an arbitration clause to resolve the issue. The applicant sought to correct the registration of the shareholders through the petitioner that his name was removed from the register fraudulently but the defendant denied the fact and said that the shares Has been moved legally and was considered by the applicant. Such credible evidence was needed to disprove such facts, which could be processed by the recording of evidence after proceedings before the High Court under section 152 of the Companies Ordinance 1984, which was summary and complex in nature. And the complex facts dispute went beyond the scope of summary action. Therefore, the High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain and decide on the petitioners' claim that the Petition Company did not fall within the scope of Section 152 of the Ordinance, 1984 and included a factual dispute. I was excluded. female advocates from Jehangira lawyer