Find a Lawyer

HAMAAD versus STATE

In the case of the prosecution of the evidence of section 13, it was not that the accused was equipped with a pistol or used the same during the main transaction which ended in the filing of the FIR under Sections 302, 148 and 149. Hua, reported in the PPC prosecution case. The FIR was that the FIR was that the accused was armed with `Kasi with which he gave a blow to the deceased, witnessing the private recovery, the complainant of the FIR and the second recovery. The witness was given, there was an interesting witness in this case, the complainant and his sole witness in the main murder case needed some independent witness to testify in the strange circumstances of the case, which was not forthcoming on record, The suspects had no compelling reason to commit a confession. And that led to his recovery, which was not the prosecutor's case, there were some suspicions in the prosecution's story that the firearm was seized by the accused. Not satisfactorily explained by the prosecution, the accused was acquitted, under circumstances \ r \ n advocate for immigration from Barbar Loi lawyer