Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAHYA AKBAR versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK THROUGH MANAGER

Articles 9, 19 and 22 appeal to the High Court suit for debt collection. The executor of the decree filed a loan case against the creditors and was the guarantor of one of the appellant lenders, who was ordered, the plaintiff bank started proceedings against the appellant. And the borrower appellant / guarantor and the lender's properties, which were in mortgage, were auctioned off at auction court on which the appellant / guarantor objected to the banking court to exclude his property from the auction schedule. Was filed, which was objected to by lenders belonging to Property Properties, Biders I can not sell their properties due to attend but the appellant / guarantee to the property was sold and the name of the successful bidder confirmation. The appellant made some allegations on the court's allegations. At the time of the auction, the court auction, bank official s and the appellant were present on the occasion. The order against the consumers / lenders should be satisfied through the sale / auction of the property of the borrower / principal lender, however if the decree was not satisfied thereafter, the properties of the guarantors could be sold. Due to the absence of bidders could not be auctioned, the appellant / guarantor property was auctioned off, which was legally owed to the principal borrower / lender and to the principal borrower owned by the guarantor. The property was not auctioned, appellant / guarantor spree with court auctions registration advocate from Qalandarabad lawyer