AKRAM ALI (KNOWN/RECORDED AS MUHAMMAD AKRAM) versus PRINCIPAL, MISALI ZAKARIYA HIGHER SECONDRY SCHOOL DINPUR, MUZAFFARGARH
Sections 46 (3) and 1 (h) of the Appellant's Relationship with Employee and Employer Appeals for Exclusion Appeals Exclusion Appeals claims dismissal of Appellant and due to a monthly salary dispute, Gate Appellant filed Labor The complaint was filed before the court, where the respondent pleaded that the appellant was not an employee of the firm and that the Labor Court had no jurisdiction to decide the matter, the attendance register was not submitted. , Salary registration and other records withheld the best evidence to prove that the appellant was not an employee of the corporation The respondent had not objected to the employment card (Exhibition) and the Labor Court's finding. The respondent was not an employee of the respondent. The statement of the appellant was put aside that he was appointed not to cross-examine by the respondent body and the part of the statement of the Chief of Examination which was not examined was considered admissible. The governing body was internally a private entity, and the appellant could knock on the Labor Court to resolve his complaint. The documentary evidence presented by the appellant in support of their requests was ignored and due to the court's error, the party could not be convicted. The Labor Court order was set aside and the appeal was granted in the circumstances. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2015
