SYED ALI SALMAN versus EDITOR, PAKISTAN BBC URDU, ISLAMABAD
Section 2 (xxxiii) and 33 Industrial and Commercial Employment Standards Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (b) (f) and Section O12 (3) redress of the individual complaint worker who still serves the Trans Provincial Establishment. I was able to refer to the National Industrial Relations Commission under section 33 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 to resolve any individual complaint. Their promotion or promotion was withheld, terminated or guaranteed or denied for any right, by any law or under any award or settlement. A former employee of a Trans Provincial Establishment may also avail himself under Section 33 of the Industrial Code. To challenge the termination of their services to the Relations Act, 2012, unless such termination is linked to an industrial dispute, or to a former member of the Trans Provincial Establishment, their removal under section 33 of the Industrial Relations Act 2012 Could not challenge where his elimination was not related to the industrial dispute, as he was not a craftsman as described in section 2 (xxxiii) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 ) If the person was employed in manual or academic work in industrial or commercial establishments, whether trans provincial Establishment may be why, in the absence of Standing Order Ordinance, the amendment in 1968, it can not be said that the National Industrial Relations Commission was dismissed as an employee of a trans-provincial establishments where, had exclusive jurisdiction. , Or their services are terminated, but not in the wake of, or in consequence of, an industrial dispute
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2015
