Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE

Sections 1616 AA, 7 517 and 505050 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition was rejected by the magistrate and the appellate court, along with the applicant's request for a grant of the superintendent of the tractor, the applicant filed a constitutional petition. Had challenged orders in the scope of The two courts below, in deciding the grant of a tractor superintendent, had acted in accordance with the law on the basis of documents prepared by the parties, otherwise the matter was related to a controversial question which could not be passed by the High Court. Will The exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction cannot be interfered with the recent findings of the courts regarding the constitutional jurisdiction because the ownership of the tractors' determination of title to the parties which can only be resolved by the civil court This can be resolved after recording. The parties who could not prove the exercise of the parties to the High Court failed to identify any illegal or legal weakness in the contrary orders of the High Court to interfere with the exercise of their constitutional jurisdiction in the present proceedings. immigration advocates from Jandanwala lawyer