Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus GHULAM HUSSAIN

Section 12 Laws Compare Signatures Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 72, 79 and 84 Specific performance of contract sale, contract authorization and failure to present the ticket vendor Compare the signatures that the defendant contends Ali had entered into a contract of sale according to the property and was partially considered but the defendant refused to perform part of his contract The plaintiff examined the minor evidence of the sale agreement and the receipt which was permanently The documentation of the ticket salesman and author was proved to be unavailable and thus did not appear in evidence. And the order passed by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff was upheld by the appellate court and the defendant contended that neither the author nor the stamp seller's record of the contract was presented and that In addition, the defendant denied the contract signatures because of the contract author's non-production and stamp seller's record, there can be no negative speculation on the contract agreement signed against the plaintiff against the sales contract. The court never applied for expert opinion and the High Court itself signed both of these documents. Comparisons were made and there was not much contradiction that the High Court refrained from expressing any opinion. On the comparison of the signatures because it was the duty of the defendant to seek expert opinion in this regard, which concludes the conclusions recorded by the two courts, misrepresentation and failure to read the evidence, the appeal was dismissed. how to become a advocate from Sahiwal lawyer