Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IKRAM-UL-HAQ versus IRFAN WAHEED


Sections 342, 452, 148 and 149 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), appeal against unauthorized delay in filing section 417 FIR. Injured women and victims who claimed to have been injured during the incident were neither examined nor prosecuted for reasons. Their non-inspection, which led to the scope of the prosecution case. The appellate court did not consider the reasons given by the appellate court for recording the bad hearing of the accused on the definition of evidence of acquittal of the respondents / accused by a bad judgment. The court was such that anyone could reach a fair review of the evidence available on a reasonable court record; the appellate court rightly decided the trial court's High Court decision, in which case, the wrong decision was doubly wrong. Was denied. The allegation of innocence was linked to the bad pass judgment by a competent court

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Dijkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.