IKRAM-UL-HAQ versus IRFAN WAHEED
Sections 342, 452, 148 and 149 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), appeal against unauthorized delay in filing section 417 FIR. Injured women and victims who claimed to have been injured during the incident were neither examined nor prosecuted for reasons. Their non-inspection, which led to the scope of the prosecution case. The appellate court did not consider the reasons given by the appellate court for recording the bad hearing of the accused on the definition of evidence of acquittal of the respondents / accused by a bad judgment. The court was such that anyone could reach a fair review of the evidence available on a reasonable court record; the appellate court rightly decided the trial court's High Court decision, in which case, the wrong decision was doubly wrong. Was denied. The allegation of innocence was linked to the bad pass judgment by a competent court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Shogram lawyer
