Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT ALI versus STATE

The presence of evidence of the complainant and other prosecution witnesses at the scene of appeal against section 417 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 was not supported as the complainant's behavior was unnatural That if he had been on the spot he would have been physically physically. The complainant and other prosecutor's witnesses contradicted the statement that the plaintiff's witness was a resident of the village located 20 km from the trial court location, in which case the defendant's witness's statement was denied. And suspected his presence at the scene, contradicting the testimony of the allegedly injured prosecutor and the general account of the medical evidence, and they sought to bring their evidence into line with the medical evidence. The version has improved even if it is said that the prosecution's witnesses were present at the scene, they alleged the incident He was not injured in his right version, but witnesses said that the prosecution suppressed the injured. The facts of the case revealed that the accused had exercised his right of defense, which brought the case under the parameters of Section 100 of PPC, there was no need to prove the allegation. Above the reasonable doubt, the trial court correctly concluded on the basis of the evidence that it was the duty of the court to decide on the basis of the evidence to record the possibility of the existence of a defense right. There was a prosecutor's version. Was not understandable and the defense version was more understandable due to which the appellants were, in the circumstances, badly acquitted by the trial court, Brayat. jobs for fresh advocates from Gilgit lawyer