Find a Lawyer

NISAR AHMAD GHAURI versus STATE

Twenty kilograms of hashish and four kilograms of opium were recovered on the charge of defining Section 9 (c) Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 103, after which the police had disclosed that there was a large and genuine application of the proceedings. In the cases registered under the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, Section 103 million PCs were excluded; under Section 25, the accused police personnel did not know about whom they had an unlawful will against them. Or was not malicious so that they could get it wrongly involved. Such a serious matter, and there were good witnesses as to what the other witnesses did in their statement under Section 342CC did not prove the defense doctrine presented by the accused and it was well established in the statements of the witnesses in the material of the case. The facts were not disputed so it can be easily wasted that the notion of right was attached to the allegations under section 29 of the Drug Substances Act, 1997, unless the contrary. It has been alleged that the failure to justify his innocence was delayed in sending the parcel to the chemical. Given the fact of the disclosure, the investigator will undoubtedly possess large quantities of drugs recovered from the crime of the policeman. Could not afford to bear the cost of And the culprits of the accused were retained criminal advocate from Mardan lawyer