MST. SAFIA BIBI versus STATE
Sections 2302 (b), 4 364 and evidence // evidence evidence prove the value of the evidence that the deceased actually died and that he died accidentally. Two of the prosecution's witnesses, who were said to be witnesses to the affidavit, turned against and did not support the trial case before the trial court complained that the complainant was merely a prosecutor. Had witnessed the trial. Confession by a co-accused in front of police is a crime, but he did admit that after being subjected to torture by police, the co-accused made such a confession. Otherwise, before the police admit that the accused's confession was unacceptable, no further evidence was on record regarding the motive of the accused's daughter, the prosecution in connection with the illicit relationship between the two accused. The evidence provided by the deposed witness had no legal value as the time of the deceased's death was never established so that closeness between the last-seen evidence and death could only be of legal benefit if viewed in the affidavit. The victim's companionship was very close to the time of his death so that he had no other body before his death Exclude any possibility of contact with. The time of death of the deceased, if any, was not established in the case when the last seen evidence was provided as the witness was not of great legal importance, there is no evidence of a case, it cannot be said. That the prosecution has, without reasonable doubt, been able to prove its case against the accused, through trial and trial of the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Sadiqabad lawyer