Section 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 0 1, R 10 Tenant Controller Principals Withdrawal proceedings regarding tenant treatment for strangers against the plaintiff's order, a lawsuit was filed for this decision. The order refusing the rent controller's request continues. It was wrong to be a party to the litigation plaintiff preferred the application under 0 1, R 10, CPC before the controller of rent which was dismissed and no appeal or revision was filed against the said order before the court. In legal or appellate practice, civil litigation is endorsed by the court. The jurisdiction can be invaded only with the final order in the appeal. The plaintiff should have filed an appeal after the final withdrawal order and ignore both orders. 0 1, R 10, the order of exclusion and final withdrawal under CPC was the special law of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance, 1979 and the plaintiff had no option but to appeal or amend any legal proceedings under it. Or submit a constitutional request. There may be two remedies in the application to suppress your complaint against the dismissal of their application under the rent controller alien by the Controller alien 0 1, R 10, CPC, under section 12 (2). Application. ), CPC to reclaim or revise an order on the basis of fraudulent or separate litigation, but they could receive only one remedy that they had previously or had already initiated and were unable to do so. They should then seize the second treatment when the plaintiff has already entered. Rent control jurisdiction and its separate articles
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
