Section 15 and 18 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request Complaint removal from the premises of the premises Defaults on the payment of rent The legacy of the landlord's legal inheritance request was invalid. Was accepted simultaneously. The High Court's jurisdiction was limited in the matter of rent. Housing cover was necessary for personal residence to the landlord. The demand of the landlord to vacate the premises cannot be considered incompetent, unfair or otherwise inappropriate. Good need and willful default cannot be interfered with. The use of constitutional jurisdiction is not required to prove the admission of evidence, evidence and / or cross examination. Such admission is proven and binding on the parties. Shall be considered and the portion of the statement shall not be challenged in the cross-examination of the witness / witness, against whom the same property was given to the witness who was in conformity with the default in payment of rent and know of his personal need. Such segmentation was not challenged with respect to default defaults. The person who is entitled to receive the rent will become the landlord and may file a withdrawal request. The landlord and tenant relationship between the parties was predetermined in the payment of the relationship and the landlord did not have the right to demand the title document. Under section 18 of the Sindh Rented Premise Ordinance 1979, the landlord was obliged by the tenants to accept the new owner as their landlord upon the receipt of the notice if the tenant changes the property to the new owner.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
