HUSSAIN JAMAL versus VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SOUTH KARACHI
Sections 16 and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional petition for the tenants to abolish the rent Article Article, not to compromise the effect between the landlord and the tenant in the possession of the tenant in the possession of the tenant. Was rejected but a request for refusal is being made. The tenancy decision was not enough to remove the jurisdiction of the tenant controller, and the tenant would continue to remain a tenant until he or she regained his ownership rights over it. The order was not approved for payment of such rent and future rent. Final decision / order and interest of the tenant will be subject to withdrawal. The tenant had secretly disobeyed the temporary rental order. The tenant should have submitted the rent to the court after finding out the penalties for non-compliance with the temporary rental order. The risk of having to compromise before the rental and the control over the physical possession of the property cannot be termed an absolute transfer of ownership rights to the tenant, nor can the landlord in a new era of litigation against the landlord. Contrary to the terms of the contract could be enforced before the rent controller's agreement with the rent controller was not enforceable and he could not defend refusal to pay. The landlord should file a lawsuit to enforce the terms of the same agreement between the parties to a specific contract for the tenancy to be executed before the court can not exceed the contract and vice versa. The violation will cause this. A.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
