HAKIM ALI versus STATE
Section 6 Evidence Appraisal of evidence The four eyewitnesses, including two injured witnesses, had identified the accused permanently, who told members of the gang of robbers on the occasion who had committed the crime at the scene, The person was not even a witness. Or there was animosity against the accused and he made straightforward and honest statements, which affected trust. Eyewitnesses also identified the accused before the trial court, persons who had actively participated in the robbery and fired. Was shot, resulting in the death of one person, and the cause of the injuries to three people was linked to some of the crime scene recovered from the crime scene recovered from the suspect, which led to ocular testimony. Medical evidence was confirmed by medical evidence and it was confirmed that its history and history The incident, \ it was up in arms and the injured places kept intact by vi victims and punish offenders convicted conditions r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Pindi gheb lawyer