TARIQ RAFIQUE SHEIKH versus CITI BANK N.A. THROUGH AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY
Section 9 and 10 financing recover lease agreement On the basis of non-possession of the property leased by the bank, the lawsuit was filed on the basis of the lease agreement, under which a car defendant was leased. The application for leave was not allowed and the decision was granted in favor of the case. The bank plea created by the defendant was that although he signed the lease document but the occupation of the car was delivered to his employer, his owner's name was also registered - in fact, he was using Waldetti Bank. They could not prove or establish this leased car. The car registration book on the lease, which was delivered to the defendant and used, shows that it was in the possession of another person when the decision was made by the banking court without determining the facts of the possession. Granted that the use of the jurisdiction of the appeal was not legally sustainable in the High Court, was set aside. The judgment and decree by the Banking Court were granted leave to defend the defendant's case and the trial was adjourned for the next decision on M. erits were allowed to appeal accordingly \ r. n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
