ALLAH DAD versus STATE
Section (?The testimony, the length of the peaks in the prosecution witnesses was sought, but they both remained steadfast and doubted their authenticity or to show that their statements had nothing to do with the witnesses). Had no adultery or complaint against the accused) No doubt both witnesses were police officers, but one policeman was as good a witness as any other person and if there was any corruption or non-evidence on his statement. It could be safely relied on without the stain on both sides. There was a writ range in which the medical examiner stated that the accused was only 16/17 years of age at the time of the presence of the accused, the record of the case was silent about any criminal history of the accused and he was the first offender In view of the youth of the accused, the controversial theory was sentenced to the accused, while on dismissing the appeal, the conviction sentence of the accused was reduced from two to two years with the benefit of Section 382 BCC. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Rangoo lawyer