Find a Lawyer

FORTE TILES THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus NATIONAL TARIFF COMMISSION THROUGH SECRETARY, ISLAMABAD

Sections 23, 27, 37, 49, 54, 55 and 56 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Implementation of the Constitution Anti-Dumping Duty Applicants imported ceramics porcelain tiles and filed entries before the notification dated 30 11 2006. Under the bill, temporary anti-dumping duty was imposed on the import of tiles thrown. - Provided the conditions of 556 Anti-Dumping Duty Ordinance, 2000 provided that they were used on or after the day of publication. Only temporary measures and the final anti-dumping duty applicable in Pakistan will be applicable. In a joint study of the Anti-Dumping Duty Ordinance 2000, the notice of confirmation preliminary or final determination in the investigations provided under Sections 49, 54 and 55 of the Anti-Dumping Duty Ordinance 2000, 2000 made it clear that the product, on the date of publication of the notice Or before Pakistan entered into Pakistan for consumption, duty may be imposed. In the circumstances, the product entered into Pakistan could not be imposed / banned before 30th 2006, when the notification was issued. The applicant had requested the Authority with the request that the tiles under consideration be imported before being imposed. Cannot be done Issue of notification dated 30 11 2006, and the authority was illegally receiving anti-dumping duty on the tiles, irrespective of the material irregularities indicated by the number of applicants, the disqualification notification was issued, constitutional Petition was allowed that improper notification was not applicable on 30.11 2006 on the import transaction made by the applicant. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Lalamusa lawyer