SOHAIL AHMAD versus STATE
Section 2302 (b) Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt established by the prosecution did not prove and with the destruction of the same record, the accused had not only his parents but also his younger brother and both of them brutally. There was another reason to kill. The sisters and, thus, wiping out the whole family, the eyewitnesses were really witnesses who failed to stay overnight at the house of events and they did not actually see it, but they were hidden in the matter. Was made The light source was suspicious in the second location, despite the fact that the five suspects were sleeping in one room and two beds, and a bedside investigator did not find any bedding or blood in the room if the accused killed the five. He committed suicide with unconventional two-handed weapons like a pressure cooker lid and a bunk leg, then raised the dead to a large extent to offer resistance or to arrest the accused. Absolutely, but there was no indication on the record that five dead persons were injured in this case. Without facing resistance, all on their head and the accused alone cannot possibly cause all such wounds. The prosecution failed to produce a report from the Chemical Examiner on record about Vesra being taken from the dead body and sent to identify poison or any intoxicating drug that preceded her death. Was created to save their lives. And at this stage the suspect investigating the injury of an incident caused by the hands of the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Bahawalnagar lawyer