Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus STATE

Sections 302 (a) and 302 (c) praise testimony, reduction of prosecution evidence was complete with impossibilities Eyewitnesses were interested and their presence was not proved on the occasion The recovery of the gun supported the prosecution's case. The medical evidence was not purely molecular evidence destroying the prosecution's version, the medical evidence, the evidence of the motive and the evidence of recovery, all not reliable, the statement of the accused under section 342 CCPC in its entirety It is to be observed that not only the required part of it is likely to be disclosed by the accused in his statement under Section 342 CCPC. That is, although it was exaggerated or talked about the possibility of suppressing the facts and getting involved, even though this family honor was somewhat involved, the accused had only a basis for doubt. There was no justification for killing two women, but on the question of family honor, the murder was provoked as a crime to commit the aggravation of being equal to the poor, while the accused was accepted daily. Not equal to the murder, the accused was entitled to be punished with the same crime of the accused under section 2302 (a), consequently the PPC would be converted to section 2302 (c). , PC and the death penalty was converted at the age of twenty on each count. registration advocate from Gharo lawyer