Section & and (c) appreciating the evidence that one of the accused's father, the accused's father, was acquitted even though it was alleged that he threw the charisma and he joined the accused. Unlike the other co-accused, Spot was not given any reason to set aside the case of the co-accused / accused's father and was also not arrested on the spot and the deck was unsuccessful. The story of the accused was in the same tone that the co-accused said, which became worse as well. When the other co-accused was arrested on the occasion, it was also likely that the accused was not involved as a co-accused in the smuggling of Chars, and for this reason he was accused of fake involvement. Didn't happen, he was acquitted of the charge \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
