Find a Lawyer

WAPDA THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

It involved a Section 115 revision dispute. In this case a transformer was on the spot which could not be decided without technical assistance, nor was the technical person appointed to the local commission nor any evidence was presented by both parties. , A non-technical person who did not even appear in the witness box, can be hard to rely on or can base the dispute on, and the trial court decided, instead of recording the evidence of the parties, Chose to make a decision and also recorded it. Issue import results based on the report of the local commission, in which case the court-wise results can be recorded by any court where no evidence was filed by the trial court while recording the import information of the case. Only the report was referenced. The Real Court was in a legal case to involve a realism dispute without seeking the evidence of the parties, especially the applicant's party or the relevant field through the Municipal Commission. The appellate court's finding was also the result of jurisdictional misconduct and material misconduct; in the circumstances the unwanted verdict was not a sustainable High Court; in the circumstances, the trial was made in the trial court. After the parties' evidence was recorded, the latest decision allowed for revision under the same \ r \ n advocates from Jauharabad lawyer