Find a Lawyer

KHALID ALIAS KHALA versus STATE

Definition of evidence in sections 302 (b) / 148 and 149 The benefit of the doubt was that no witness was available for the incident and the whole case depends on the case to be prosecuted, however, the FIR filed by the complainant did not Neither was charged with motive. It was alleged that there was a dispute between the accused and the victim about the matter, but in all the evidence of the complainant, who was the brother of the victim, it did not appear in the evidence that the accused and who. There is a kind of money dispute. The dead story could have been thought of as a trigger, allegedly failing to prove a motive for the incident. The complainant, but both of them contradicted each other on material points, namely the identity story at the time of the incident, cannot be ascertained for the purpose of the death sentence as given by other prosecutor's witnesses. Only one of the suspects was named in the IR version, which was not credible and not trustworthy, when he confessed that he was coming from Dera at odd times. The source of the light was available when he saw that the two suspects were empty and the rifle was assembled at the same time, fabricated or tampered with, cannot be denied, especially when the suspect was already arrested, In the cases, the case failed to establish beyond any doubt the shadow of doubt against the accused persons, the trial court granted trial and sentence against the accused, they were set aside, giving them the benefit of the doubt. Accused was acquitted. best advocate from Laliah lawyer