Find a Lawyer

ABDUS SAMAD KHAN versus ABDULLAH

Under section 53 of the Property Act 1882, it has been conceded that Wendy's claim that the defendant is not entitled to benefit under the cancellation agreement asserts that the defendant claims to have purchased the property from the plaintiff without notice of the plaintiff's title. Has admitted in his interim examination. It had executed with the vendors, written agreements to sell the property but they were canceled which led to the lawsuit being filed by such vendors. On this score, the defendant was mentioned in the K platform, and was not properly entertained by the trial court Wendy's, so would not be entitled to benefit under the cancellation agreement. advocate from Abbaspur lawyer